Author summary
34% 1 analyzed article/video 1,300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stan Veuger results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 421 hits . Analysis detected 3,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,993 of 6,245 authors). This Stan Veuger is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Stan Veuger
Author details
Total words: 5,200
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst