Author summary
59% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,707 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cesar Cadenas results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 3,086 hits . Analysis detected 20,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,479 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,737 of 6,628 authors). This Cesar Cadenas is better (less manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Cesar Cadenas
Author details
Total words: 21,479
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.4%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst