Author summary
47% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Diaz results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,130 hits . Analysis detected 8,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,766 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,534 of 6,628 authors). This Maria Diaz is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Maria Diaz
Author details
Total words: 8,766
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 12.9%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst