Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These David Gewirtz results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 1,183 hits . Analysis detected 11,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,805 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This David Gewirtz is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. David Gewirtz
Author details
Total words: 16,805
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst