Topic summary
49% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Actions results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 4,742 hits . Analysis detected 35,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,712 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (12,222 of 16,558 topics). This Presidential Actions is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Presidential Actions
Topic details
Total words: 34,712
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles34.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst