Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kat Lonsdorf results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,473 hits. Analysis detected 14,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,392 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,799 of 6,359 authors). This Kat Lonsdorf is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Kat Lonsdorf
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
41%Kat Lonsdorf (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,392
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510040.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos