Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Bowman results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,627 hits . Analysis detected 15,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,080 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,453 of 6,628 authors). This Tom Bowman is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Tom Bowman
Author details
Total words: 13,080
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 12.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst