Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graham Smith results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Status Quo Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 528 hits . Analysis detected 4,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 88% (836 of 6,628 authors). This Graham Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Graham Smith
Author details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.4% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 14.6% 14.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.5% 21.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.8% 5.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 12.3%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Straw Man: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst