Author summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Banco results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 677 hits . Analysis detected 3,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,192 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,034 of 6,244 authors). This Erin Banco is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Erin Banco
Author details
Total words: 3,192
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.2% 21.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 10.6%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst