Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Stewart results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 668 hits . Analysis detected 3,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,980 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,318 of 6,348 authors). This Phil Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Phil Stewart
Author details
Total words: 3,980
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 13.7% 13.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 13.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst