Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jana Choukeir results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Status Quo Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 3,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,532 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,570 of 6,140 authors). This Jana Choukeir is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Jana Choukeir
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
59%Jana Choukeir (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,532
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos