Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maha El Dahan results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Slippery Slope , with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 184 hits . Analysis detected 1,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 89% (687 of 6,138 authors). This Maha El Dahan is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group. Maha El Dahan
Author details
Total words: 1,032
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.8% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 17.8% 17.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.4% 6.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.4% 10.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.8% 7.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.1%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Author 14.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Middle Ground: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst