Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Enas Alashray results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 3,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,112 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,792 of 6,228 authors). This Enas Alashray is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Enas Alashray
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
72%Enas Alashray (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,112
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.2%16.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.7%16.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos