Newsmax⁠75%

US Carries Out New Strikes on Iran Military Site, Official Says ⁠62%

By Phil Stewart⁠0%

5/28/2026, 12:24:15 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 389 faulty-reasoning hits from 205 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (8,485 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the article peer group.

The U.S. military carried out new strikes overnight in Iran targeting a military site that officials believed posed a threat to U.S. forces and commercial maritime traffic in the Strait of ​Hormuz, a U.S. official told Reuters on Wednesday. 
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the U.S. military has also intercepted and shot down multiple Iranian drones that posed a similar threat. 
The U.S. military strikes, which have not been previously reported, came during negotiations to end a three-month-old war that has killed thousands and sent global energy prices sharply higher since it began on Feb. 28 with U.S. and Israeli attacks. 
President Donald Trump earlier on Wednesday dismissed a Iranian state media report that Iran and Oman would jointly manage shipping through the Strait of Hormuz as part of a peace deal. 
Trump said the waterway would remain open. 
The U.S. last carried out what it called defensive strikes against Iran on Monday, in what Iran called a violation of the countries' fragile ceasefire. 
The U.S. targets included boats attempting to lay mines and missile launch sites that the U.S. military's Central Command said posed a threat to U.S. forces. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.1%Phil Stewart: 4.2%Newsmax: 3.4%Confirmation Bias15.1%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.6%Newsmax: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.4%Newsmax: 3.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.7%Newsmax: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 3.1%Newsmax: 3.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%Phil Stewart: 16.8%Newsmax: 11.0%Framing Effect12.2%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Phil Stewart: 1.9%Newsmax: 4.1%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 2.5%Newsmax: 2.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.5%Phil Stewart: 5.1%Newsmax: 10.3%Negativity Bias19.5%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.2%Newsmax: 3.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Phil Stewart: 0.7%Newsmax: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error12.7%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.1%Newsmax: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.1%Newsmax: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.8%Newsmax: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 44.4%Phil Stewart: 11.5%Newsmax: 4.8%Appeal to Authority44.4%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.2%Newsmax: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.0%Newsmax: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 3.1%Newsmax: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.4%Newsmax: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.1%Newsmax: 6.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 3.4%Phil Stewart: 1.0%Newsmax: 1.1%Begging the Question3.4%This article: 19.5%Phil Stewart: 2.0%Newsmax: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.5%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.1%Newsmax: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 2.6%Newsmax: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.7%Newsmax: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.9%Newsmax: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 31.7%Phil Stewart: 13.7%Newsmax: 3.1%Unattributed Quote31.7%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 1.9%Newsmax: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 27.8%Phil Stewart: 8.3%Newsmax: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice27.8%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Phil Stewart: 0.0%Newsmax: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

205 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers31%attributed speech141writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 31 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 26 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words59% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice+63.1 ptsWriter: 18.4%Donald Trump: 81.6%81.6%Unattributed Quote-46.1 ptsWriter: 46.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.