Topic summary
35% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Plane Crash results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 2,261 hits . Analysis detected 13,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,769 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (11,065 of 16,234 topics). This Plane Crash is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Plane Crash
Topic details
Total words: 16,769
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst