Author summary
β 0% 22 analyzed articles/videos 9,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OAN Staff results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 9,360 hits . Analysis detected 62,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,155 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of β 79% (1,305 of 6,137 authors). This OAN Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. OAN Staff
Author details
Total words: 28,155
Article count: 22
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.7% percentile 4.5% BS Score22 analyzed articles28.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0β50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 24.2% 24.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.9% 25.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 33.2% 33.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 9.3% 9.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 33.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst