Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blake Wolf results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 64.4% saturation with 2,215 hits. Analysis detected 10,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,437 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (419 of 6,207 authors). This Blake Wolf is worse (more manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group.
Blake Wolf
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
94%Blake Wolf (selected)9%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,437
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510093.3% percentile
8.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 64.5%64.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 32.6%32.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 19.1%19.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 24.5%24.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 14.3%14.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 15.4%15.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Author 64.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 32.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 16.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 15.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Author 9.1%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate