Topic summary
46% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Hegseth results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 4,085 hits . Analysis detected 33,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,129 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,185 of 15,326 topics). This Pete Hegseth is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Pete Hegseth
Topic details
Total words: 32,129
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles32.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst