Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David E. Sanger results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,713 hits . Analysis detected 13,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,407 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,951 of 6,374 authors). This David E. Sanger is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. David E. Sanger
Author details
Total words: 10,407
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst