Topic summary
75% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Netflix results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 3,756 hits . Analysis detected 27,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,391 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,418 of 15,689 topics). This Netflix is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Netflix
Topic details
Total words: 25,391
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles25.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst