Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Willa Rubin results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hindsight Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48% saturation with 272 hits . Analysis detected 1,452 faulty-reasoning hits from 567 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of 96% (266 of 6,359 authors). This Willa Rubin is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group. Willa Rubin
Author details
Total words: 567
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.8% percentile 11.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles567 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 30.7% 30.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 30.7% 30.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 48.0% 48.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 20.5% 20.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 20.5% 20.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 17.1% 17.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 48.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 30.7%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 30.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 20.5%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 20.5%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 17.1%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.5%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst