Author summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christina Izzo results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 670 hits. Analysis detected 5,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,005 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (967 of 6,231 authors). This Christina Izzo is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Christina Izzo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠85%Christina Izzo (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,005
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510084.5% percentile
5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 13.1%13.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.8%15.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.0%9.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.1%13.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 16.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 13.1%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos