Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 840 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucas Shaw results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Optimism Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.4% saturation with 1,244 hits . Analysis detected 4,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of â 93% (449 of 6,363 authors). This Lucas Shaw is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group. Lucas Shaw
Author details
Total words: 2,520
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.0% percentile 8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 49.4% 49.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 15.2% 15.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.5% 10.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 49.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst