Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos4,184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nancy Guthrie Disappearance results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 3,222 hits. Analysis detected 16,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,540 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,271 of 15,753 topics). This Nancy Guthrie Disappearance is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 25.7%25.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.3%12.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos