Topic summary
48% 8 analyzed articles/videos 7,614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitch Mcconnell results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 4,471 hits . Analysis detected 27,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,783 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (13,063 of 15,933 topics). This Mitch Mcconnell is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Mitch Mcconnell
Topic details
Total words: 28,783
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles28.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst