Topic summary
73%6 analyzed articles/videos7,826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mexican Cuisine results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 3,756 hits. Analysis detected 27,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,355 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,490 of 15,330 topics). This Mexican Cuisine is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles27.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate