Author summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Deseran results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 2,559 hits . Analysis detected 14,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,989 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,366 of 6,304 authors). This Sara Deseran is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. Sara Deseran
Author details
Total words: 10,989
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.3% 23.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 16.5% 16.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.2% 12.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 16.5%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst