Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leah Harper results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 565 hits. Analysis detected 4,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (2,527 of 6,296 authors). This Leah Harper is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Leah Harper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠60%Leah Harper (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,724
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.7%9.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 12.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos