Move over matcha lattes: horchata is cold, creamy and coming to a menu near you 19%

By Leah Harper0%

5/23/2026, 7:00:29 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Recency Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 342 hits. Analysis detected 2,724 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,181 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of 19% (17,883 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the article peer group.

Having lived through the “matcha revolution”, I’ve become used to giving unfamiliar drinks a go. 
From bubble tea to pumpkin-spiced lattes, coffee tonic to ube frappes, I’ll try anything twice and  compared to those beverages  horchata feels like a more palatable prospect. 
The refreshing yet creamy cold drink from Spain and Mexico is often compared to cereal milk, which has also gained popularity as a flavour in its own right and is increasingly cropping up on menus elsewhere. 
Last month, Starbucks announced that, in the US, an iced horchata shaken espresso would be returning to its summer menu (this year joined by a new horchata frappuccino), having outperformed all previous seasonal iced shaken espresso beverages by an impressive 44%. 
In the UK, where horchata is less commonplace, I started spotting “dirty” versions, with added espresso, on coffee shop menus, alongside “dirty chai”. 
It wasn’t long before the algorithm took over and my Instagram/TikTok feeds filled with recipes for how to make my own  usually Mexican-style, which blends rice and cinnamon soaked in water with vanilla and sugar. 
Traditionally, it’s part of the dairy- and alcohol-free “aguas frescas” family, but many modern recipes add milk. 
Spanish horchata is typically made from soaked, ground and sweetened tiger nuts  which are not nuts at all, but tubers  and is often served alongside “fartons”, cigar-shaped Valencian pastries. 
Keen to try it, I head to Mestizo Mexican market in Camden, London, in search of what I hope is authentic horchata. 
For £6.50, I pick up a bottle of Mexquisita horchata concentrate  enough to make 5.6 litres, which seems like a lot. 
Confident in my ability to get it wrong, I also purchase a freshly prepared version. 
Adriana, who whips up my beverage, tells me it’s a popular drink with her and her friends  they like to add evaporated milk and top it with crushed walnuts. 
It’s cool and sweet and smooth  easy to gulp down on a hot day and reminiscent of chai, especially the cinnamon dregs, but without the black-tea caffeine kick. 
Over the last three months up to publication, UK Google searches for “what is horchata” have risen 30%, while searches for “mexican horchata” are up 20%. 
Worryingly, “horchata BuzzBallz” (yes, it exists) has been deemed a “breakout” term, meaning searches are up by more than 5,000%. 
“I predicted exactly this for horchata,” says Sabina Palermo, founder of Hi Cacti in Brighton, which started out as a Tex-Mex-inspired cactus shop. 
“In Mexico, it’s very popular for children, so it’s usually quite a nostalgic flavour.” 
After 10 years, she recently “pivoted the business” and started serving coffee and other drinks, including horchata lattes (hot and iced; £4), horchata matcha, horchata chai and coconut horchata. 
The list, she says, keeps growing: “Today, we played around with adding rose syrup to the horchata latte.” 
It’s not just coffee; horchata has been getting the cocktail treatment, too. 
In west London, Latin American-inspired cocktail bar Viajante87 offers a “horchata colada”, blending the milky mix with rum, while Edinburgh’s Tapas3 offers a “horchata martini” using the Spanish variation of the drink. 
At Motley, Manchester, the Millionaire Shortbread 12 cocktail blends Disaronno, Licor 43 Horchata, biscuit and cream to create “dessert in a glass”. 
Restaurant group Wahaca has long featured horchata on its soft drinks menu, and last year included a “tipsy horchata” with rum on the cocktail list, which outsold its more traditional sparkling wine-based cocktail. 
“It is also delicious with a dash of tequila added to it,” says Wahaca co-founder Thomasina Miers. 
“It is incredibly refreshing, particularly in hot weather, and goes beautifully with spicy food.” 
Tacos Padre, a Mexican taqueria in London’s Borough Market, started doing a series of horchatas at the start of this year: a new horchata every month for £2.50 each. 
“People really love it, big time,” says owner and head chef Nicholas Fitzgerald. 
So far, they’ve had a plain horchata, a roasted version, chocolate horchata and black sesame horchata. 
They are about to launch a melon-seed one, which he says has more of a comforting, rice pudding-esque flavour. 
“People went nuts for the black sesame one,” he says. 
“It’s kind of a niche thing but people who have had it before are absolutely delighted to see it on the menu.” 
Elsewhere, horchata is being used in desserts outright. 
At Condesa Tapas in Covent Garden, London, a pan de elote (Mexican cornbread) comes with a horchata foam, while Glasgow’s Topolabamba offers horchata ice-cream, supplied by Dundee gelateria Crolla’s. 
“I sometimes describe it as tasting like an old-school Caramac bar, or vanilla with burnt caramel and a little bit of cinnamon in there,” general manager Hannah tells me as I tuck in. 
It’s super creamy and unrelentingly sweet, with less of the spiced flavour of the drink. 
It’s delicious, but I struggle to finish the two hefty scoops. 
Back home, I set about recreating the drink: 240ml of concentrate mixed with 1.6l water, as per the bottle’s instructions. 
I give it a stir, then pour over ice. 
The resulting drink is noticeably thinner than the version made for me by Adriana. 
It’s a real sugar rush. 
I’d just hit a 4pm slump; now I feel as if I’ve downed an energy drink. 
In the UK, Spain’s tiger-nut horchata appears less prevalent  but dairy alternative brand Rude Health launched a tiger-nut drink in 2017, which is available in supermarkets. 
Interestingly, it also uses rice, but blends it with organic tiger-nut butter (plus water and sea salt). 
Its recommended “twist on traditional horchata” recipe doesn’t require added sugar, and the result is creamy  a little like almond milk  slightly spiced and far less sweet. 
Maybe not sweet enough? 
I add a shot of rum, for balance. 
Perfecto. 
“I moved to England 20 years ago and since then the rise in interest in Mexican culture, Mexican tourism, has massively increased,” says Palermo, who is originally from Austin, Texas. 
It’s true that Mexico welcomed 16.5 million international visitors by air between January and October 2025  including more than 370,000 from the UK, a 3.2% increase over the same period the previous year. 
“People are travelling there, experiencing all the colours and the flavours, and you can’t help but get sucked into it,” she says. 
Which reminds me: I’ve still got more than half a litre of horchata syrup to get through. 
So I set about making a horchata-based dessert using Food52’s spicy horchata flan recipe, one of the only recipes I found to incorporate the concentrate, rather than horchata made from scratch. 
It looks  and indeed tastes  like a giant creme brulee: silky smooth, caramelly, the horchata syrup standing in for caster sugar in the egg mix, with far less sickly results than some of the other concoctions I’ve tried. 
I serve it to guests who compare it to Basque cheesecake and it quickly disappears; a horchata hit! 
And just under half the bottle still to use. 
Black-sesame horchata margarita, anyone? 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Leah Harper: 4.5%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 1.9%Leah Harper: 1.8%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias1.9%This article: 11.9%Leah Harper: 6.6%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic11.9%This article: 9.7%Leah Harper: 3.5%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic9.7%This article: 1.9%Leah Harper: 1.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Leah Harper: 2.0%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 1.6%Leah Harper: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion1.6%This article: 3.7%Leah Harper: 0.9%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 2.2%Leah Harper: 0.6%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.2%This article: 11.6%Leah Harper: 2.9%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias11.6%This article: 0.3%Leah Harper: 0.1%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.3%This article: 7.2%Leah Harper: 1.8%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias7.2%This article: 3.7%Leah Harper: 1.4%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 1.2%Leah Harper: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias1.2%This article: 6.2%Leah Harper: 1.5%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%Leah Harper: 2.8%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect11.3%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 18.6%Leah Harper: 5.2%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias18.6%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.3%Leah Harper: 5.9%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority16.3%This article: 1.9%Leah Harper: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma1.9%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%Leah Harper: 5.0%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 9.4%Leah Harper: 5.2%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon9.4%This article: 1.9%Leah Harper: 1.7%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion1.9%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.7%Leah Harper: 3.6%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.7%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.9%Leah Harper: 1.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.9%This article: 1.0%Leah Harper: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division1.0%This article: 21.9%Leah Harper: 7.6%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal21.9%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 21.2%Leah Harper: 9.7%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice21.2%This article: 0.3%Leah Harper: 0.1%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination0.3%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Leah Harper: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 29.0%Leah Harper: 12.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…29.0%

1181 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers28%attributed speech846writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageStarbucks • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAdriana • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSabina Palermo • 23 words • 100.0% coverageSabina Palermo • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSabina Palermo • 29 words • 100.0% coverageSabina Palermo • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageThomasina Miers • 17 words • 0.0% coverageThomasina Miers • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageNicholas Fitzgerald • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageNicholas Fitzgerald • 19 words • 0.0% coverageNicholas Fitzgerald • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNicholas Fitzgerald • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageHannah • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSabina Palermo • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageSabina Palermo • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Starbucks

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words12% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +70.0 ptsWriter: 30.0%Starbucks: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-25.2 ptsWriter: 25.2%Starbucks: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.5 ptsWriter: 0.5%Starbucks: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.