Topic summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 13,118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Met Gala results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 7,768 hits . Analysis detected 46,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,540 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,135 of 15,266 topics). This Met Gala is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Met Gala
Topic details
Total words: 43,540
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score12 analyzed articles43.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst