Author summary
70% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lillian Gissen results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 2,099 hits . Analysis detected 12,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,939 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,126 of 6,138 authors). This Lillian Gissen is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group. Lillian Gissen
Author details
Total words: 6,939
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.7% percentile 4.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.5% 21.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 15.1% 15.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.3% 30.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 30.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.6%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 15.1%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst