Janice Dickinson's changing face: See the supermodel BEFORE she underwent plastic surgery as she shares shocking results from latest procedure 59%

By Lillian Gissen69%

5/31/2026, 11:47:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 53.8% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.6% and a BS Rank of 59% (8,981 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the article peer group.

Janice Dickinson shocked the world when she shared the dramatic results of her facelift last week. 
She certainly looked very different from when she dominated the modeling industry during the 1970s. 
The TV personality and businesswoman, 71, certainly looked very different from when she dominated the modeling industry during the 1970s and 1980s. 
She's seen in 1977. 
Dickinson has never been shy about her love of cosmetic enhancements and has admitted to undergoing several plastic surgeries over the years. 
She's seen in 1977. 
The star, who has declared herself as the world's first supermodel, was skyrocketed into the spotlight in the early 1970s. 
She's seen in 1978. 
She appeared on the covers of top magazines like Harper's Bazaar, Cosmopolitan, Vogue and Playboy and worked with acclaimed fashion houses including Versace, Oscar de la Renta and Calvin Klein when she was young. 
She's seen posing in 1986. 
She's seen in April. 
The fashion star's chameleon-esque habit of changing up her appearance has led critics to regularly brand her as 'unrecognizable.' 
She's seen in 1978. 
She's pictured last year. 
Over the years, Dickinson has also admitted to getting a breast enlargement, tummy tuck, neck lift and liposuction. 
She's also tried injectables like Botox. 
She's seen in 2005. 
Her many procedures have prompted shock from even her most dedicated fans over the years. 
She's seen in 2024. 
The fashion star's chameleon-esque habit of changing up her appearance has led critics to regularly brand her as 'unrecognizable.' 
She's seen left in 1978 and right last year. 
Earlier this year, Dickinson claimed that her face has been permanently disfigured from a fall she suffered while filming the UK reality series I'm A Celebrity... 
South Africa in late 2022. 
Earlier this week, plastic surgeon Dr Harrison Lee revealed on Instagram that Dickinson received a full facial overhaul in February. 
She's seen before the surgery. 
She's seen after the surgery. 
Dr Lee is no stranger to handling celebrity makeovers, having previously worked on Caitlyn Jenner and Dylan Mulvaney. 
He shared that Dickinson underwent an endoscopic brow and mid-facelift, a deep plane facelift, a dual plane neck lift, a subnasal lip lift and an extensive fat transfer to turn back the clock. 
On top of that, she also had a full face CO2 laser resurfacing to rejuvenate her complexion. 
Dr Lee, who is a triple board-certified surgeon, said that Dickinson was 'beyond ecstatic' while sharing the results. 
Photos taken three months after the procedures show Dickinson looking noticeably younger and fresher than she did before, with fewer wrinkles and much smoother skin. 
'I f**king love it,' gushed the former America's Next Top Model judge in a comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.2%Lillian Gissen: 4.5%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias10.2%This article: 2.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.5%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias2.0%This article: 15.9%Lillian Gissen: 6.3%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic15.9%This article: 4.8%Lillian Gissen: 2.6%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.8%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Lillian Gissen: 11.1%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.9%Lillian Gissen: 0.7%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias10.9%This article: 5.7%Lillian Gissen: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 19.4%Lillian Gissen: 28.2%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias19.4%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.8%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 2.7%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.3%Lillian Gissen: 6.9%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect15.3%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 14.2%Lillian Gissen: 3.6%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias14.2%This article: 3.3%Lillian Gissen: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 26.8%Lillian Gissen: 5.0%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority26.8%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 2.7%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.8%Lillian Gissen: 15.0%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization21.8%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 8.3%Lillian Gissen: 4.6%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon8.3%This article: 11.1%Lillian Gissen: 16.9%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion11.1%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.4%Lillian Gissen: 3.0%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.4%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.7%Lillian Gissen: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.7%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.5%Lillian Gissen: 5.1%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal6.5%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 2.0%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 29.6%Lillian Gissen: 12.8%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote29.6%This article: 4.4%Lillian Gissen: 4.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection4.4%This article: 53.8%Lillian Gissen: 18.5%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice53.8%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 2.6%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

459 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers24%attributed speech347writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJanice Dickinson • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDr Harrison Lee • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageDr Harrison Lee • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageDr Harrison Lee • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageJanice Dickinson • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dr Harrison Lee

100%flagged-word coverage
71 attributed words63% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+93.1 ptsWriter: 6.9%Dr Harrison Lee: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-71.2 ptsWriter: 71.2%Dr Harrison Lee: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Dr Harrison Lee: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.