Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janice Dickinson results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 409 hits. Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,662 of 16,562 topics). This Janice Dickinson is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Janice Dickinson
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.3%22.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.6%14.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos