Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inga Parkel results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,136 hits . Analysis detected 9,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,811 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (4,907 of 6,228 authors). This Inga Parkel is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Inga Parkel
Author details
Total words: 12,811
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst