Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellie Violet Bramley results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 964 hits . Analysis detected 8,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,333 of 6,196 authors). This Ellie Violet Bramley is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Ellie Violet Bramley
Author details
Total words: 11,224
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst