Topic summary
92%13 analyzed articles/videos4,995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Markets results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 2,652 hits. Analysis detected 25,879 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,509 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 48% (7,963 of 15,142 topics). This Markets is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score13 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate