Author summary
98%1 analyzed article/video241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Davis Giangiulio results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 962 faulty-reasoning hits from 723 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (462 of 6,171 authors). This Davis Giangiulio is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Davis Giangiulio
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
93%Davis Giangiulio (selected)9%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 723
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510092.5% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles723 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 20.3%20.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 15.5%15.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 14.4%14.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.5%3.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 20.3%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos