Topic summary
71% 23 analyzed articles/videos 12,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judiciary results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 8,513 hits . Analysis detected 72,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 60,247 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,624 of 16,097 topics). This Judiciary is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Judiciary
Topic details
Total words: 60,247
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score23 analyzed articles60.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst