Author summary
14%3 analyzed articles/videos380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan H. Adler results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 2,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,953 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,682 of 6,612 authors). This Jonathan H. Adler is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Jonathan H. Adler
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
30%Jonathan H. Adler (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,953
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos