Topic summary
56% 15 analyzed articles/videos 11,728 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Health results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 7,970 hits . Analysis detected 50,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 65,476 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (15,163 of 16,562 topics). This Global Health is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Global Health
Topic details
Total words: 65,476
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score15 analyzed articles65.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst