Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sophie Neiman results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 693 hits. Analysis detected 2,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,365 authors). This Sophie Neiman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sophie Neiman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Sophie Neiman (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 6,852
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos