Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Fenske results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 366 hits . Analysis detected 3,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,097 of 6,348 authors). This Emma Fenske is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. Emma Fenske
Author details
Total words: 4,036
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst