Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Roderick Wong results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Overconfidence Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 326 hits . Analysis detected 2,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Roderick Wong is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Roderick Wong
Author details
Total words: 2,052
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.9% 15.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 13.4%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst