Topic summary
68% 22 analyzed articles/videos 8,661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaming results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 6,593 hits . Analysis detected 47,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,293 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,132 of 15,352 topics). This Gaming is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Gaming
Topic details
Total words: 40,293
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score22 analyzed articles40.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst