Author summary
47% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebekah Valentine results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 2,154 hits . Analysis detected 19,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,619 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,157 of 6,316 authors). This Rebekah Valentine is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. Rebekah Valentine
Author details
Total words: 23,619
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles23.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.5% 4.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst