Topic summary
59%8 analyzed articles/videos3,316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gambling results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 2,506 hits. Analysis detected 18,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,246 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (9,750 of 15,364 topics). This Gambling is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate