spiked⁠93%

Why Andy Burnham will crash and burn ⁠88%

By spiked⁠0%

7/4/2026, 7:55:09 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 216 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 81% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,633 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the article peer group.

Benedict Spence joins Chris Snowdon and Tom Slater for the latest episode of Last Orders. 
They discuss the mirage of ‘Manchesterism’, why the Beeb should become a Netflix-style subscription service and the coming tax raid on the gambling industry. 
Listen, share and give us a glowing review on your podcast app. 
Also, send your postbag questions, theories and ban suggestions to lastorders@spiked-online.com and we’ll try to answer them in a future episode. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%spiked: 7.6%spiked: 8.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.9%spiked: 4.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%spiked: 1.8%spiked: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias8.9%This article: 30.4%spiked: 26.2%spiked: 8.4%Framing Effect30.4%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.4%spiked: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.7%spiked: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%spiked: 6.0%spiked: 2.6%Pessimism Bias8.9%This article: 39.2%spiked: 35.5%spiked: 13.1%Negativity Bias39.2%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.7%spiked: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 8.8%spiked: 3.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.6%spiked: 4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 8.9%spiked: 0.7%spiked: 1.0%Horn Effect8.9%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%spiked: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%spiked: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%spiked: 7.7%spiked: 7.3%Ad Hominem8.9%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.6%spiked: 5.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.2%spiked: 4.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.0%spiked: 3.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.9%spiked: 16.8%spiked: 15.0%Hasty Generalization8.9%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.6%spiked: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.4%spiked: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 39.2%spiked: 19.0%spiked: 8.0%Appeal to Emotion39.2%This article: 0.0%spiked: 6.8%spiked: 2.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.7%spiked: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.5%spiked: 4.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.1%spiked: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.1%spiked: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.4%spiked: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 39.2%spiked: 27.4%spiked: 25.8%Biased Writer Voice39.2%This article: 0.0%spiked: 7.5%spiked: 3.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 39.2%spiked: 26.3%spiked: 9.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias39.2%This article: 41.8%spiked: 28.3%spiked: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…41.8%

79 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.