Keyword summary
96% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manchesterism results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 462 hits . Analysis detected 4,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,240 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,366 of 37,533 keywords). This Manchesterism is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Manchesterism
Keyword details
Total words: 3,240
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst