Keyword summary
96%4 analyzed articles/videos1,004 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manchesterism results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 462 hits. Analysis detected 4,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,240 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,366 of 37,533 keywords). This Manchesterism is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Manchesterism
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
68%Manchesterism (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,240
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510067.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos