spiked⁠93%

Why King Andy’s coronation is an outrage against democracy ⁠90%

By spiked⁠0%

7/3/2026, 4:30:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 77.1% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 379 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,330 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the article peer group.

Ross Kempsell and Luke Gittos join Fraser Myers for the latest episode of the spiked podcast. 
They discuss the hollowness of ‘Manchesterism’, the lethal stupidity of Britain’s broken borders, and the witch-hunt against Nigel Farage. 
Watch the videos from the spiked summit – our biggest ever live event. spiked supporters can get exclusive early access to the panels and speeches here. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 27.1%spiked: 7.6%spiked: 8.9%Confirmation Bias27.1%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 37.1%spiked: 2.9%spiked: 4.0%Availability Heuristic37.1%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.8%spiked: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 77.1%spiked: 26.2%spiked: 8.4%Framing Effect77.1%This article: 37.1%spiked: 1.4%spiked: 0.3%Loss Aversion37.1%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.7%spiked: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 6.0%spiked: 2.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 40.0%spiked: 35.5%spiked: 13.1%Negativity Bias40.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.7%spiked: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 8.8%spiked: 3.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 27.1%spiked: 4.6%spiked: 4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias27.1%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%spiked: 1.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%spiked: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%spiked: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 27.1%spiked: 7.7%spiked: 7.3%Ad Hominem27.1%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.6%spiked: 5.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.2%spiked: 4.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.0%spiked: 3.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 16.8%spiked: 15.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.6%spiked: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 37.1%spiked: 3.4%spiked: 0.9%Bandwagon37.1%This article: 27.1%spiked: 19.0%spiked: 8.0%Appeal to Emotion27.1%This article: 12.9%spiked: 6.8%spiked: 2.1%Begging the Question12.9%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.7%spiked: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.5%spiked: 4.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 27.1%spiked: 4.1%spiked: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)27.1%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.1%spiked: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 37.1%spiked: 4.4%spiked: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection37.1%This article: 40.0%spiked: 27.4%spiked: 25.8%Biased Writer Voice40.0%This article: 27.1%spiked: 7.5%spiked: 3.2%Indoctrination27.1%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 26.3%spiked: 9.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 60.0%spiked: 28.3%spiked: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…60.0%

70 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.