Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley DiMella results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 505 hits . Analysis detected 4,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,560 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,851 of 6,628 authors). This Ashley DiMella is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Ashley DiMella
Author details
Total words: 4,560
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.0% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst